 B.C. Premier Christy Clark announces new provincial loans to help first-time homebuyers cover as much as half of their down payment. (CBC) GEORDON OMAND (GLOBE & MAIL) A new interest-free loan program touted by the British Columbia government as a boon to first-time homebuyers who are struggling to save for a down payment is drawing harsh criticism from economists and other experts who pan the proposal as a politically motivated move that is likely to inflate housing prices even further. The program could end up boosting demand – and therefore prices – by encouraging even more people to compete over the same number of homes, said Joshua Gottlieb of the Vancouver School of Economics.
“It seems like a policy that does not reflect an understanding of the current markets or basic economics,” he said in an interview. “This is actually not really promoting ownership. This is promoting owning a small share of a home and taking a big risk with other people’s money.” The provincewide program provides a matching loan that is interest-free and payment-free for the first five years to residents buying their first home, capped at 5 per cent of a property’s purchase price to a maximum of $750,000. That means the government could contribute up to $37,500 for each eligible home purchase. The province did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Premier Christy Clark has touted the program as an effective tool to help first-time buyers whose only barrier to home ownership is lack of a down payment. The last thing the real estate market needs is stimulus, said Tom Davidoff, an economist and housing expert at the University of British Columbia’s Sauder School of Business. “Nobody thinks the problem with Canada’s housing market, and in particular Vancouver’s housing market, is that it’s just too dead and the values are depressed and nobody wants to buy,” he said. Nathanael Lauster, a sociologist at UBC, said the timing of the announcement is telling, coming in the lead-up to next year’s provincial election. A program designed to juice up the housing market benefits developers and the real estate and construction industries, as well as homeowners and residents who are already wealthy enough to qualify for the loan, Mr. Lauster said. These are all groups that tend to support the B.C. Liberals, he said. Paul Kershaw at the university’s school of population and public health saluted the province’s attempt at assisting young people, but said the move would inevitably drive up prices and encourage people to take on more debt. “I can sum it up in four words: right intention, wrong execution,” he said. The program also doesn’t discriminate between people who can’t afford a down payment and those who can, which economics professor Tsur Somerville said wastes tax dollars by giving subsidies to people who don’t need the help. Taxpayers also take on financial risk because the government is on the hook if buyers default on mortgage payments, added Mr. Somerville, who teaches at UBC and is also the founder of Generation Squeeze, an advocacy group for Canadians in their 40s or younger. Funding for the plan will come from a 15-per-cent tax on foreign-homebuyers, a luxury tax on homes worth over $2-million and from property-transfer tax revenues. Bryan Yu, a senior economist with Central 1 Credit Union, said while he doesn’t see the program having much of a negative effect for most people, he questions whether it is a lost opportunity. “The question is: Is this really the best bang for your buck in terms of housing affordability?” Mr. Yu asked. The provincial measure sends mixed signals to the market, offsetting steps already taken by the federal government, he said. The federal Finance Department tightened requirements on mortgage lending in response to concerns over runaway real estate in urban areas, such as Vancouver and Toronto. While academics appear unanimous in their criticism of the government’s Home Owner Mortgage Equity Partnership program, the industry commends the initiative. “Anything that assists first-time homebuyers get on that property ladder now is definitely a good thing,” said Paul Taylor, head of Mortgage Professionals Canada. Neil Moody, CEO of the Canadian Home Builders’ Association of B.C., said the measure is about helping people start to build equity. Anne McMullin of the Urban Development Institute agreed, adding that the financial risk to taxpayers would be minimal because buyers still need to qualify for a mortgage based on the new rules.   90,000 warning letters going out this week LISA JOHNSON (CBC NEWS) - Despite a cooling real estate market, many Vancouver-area property owners will see a "significant increase" in the assessed values of their homes, with increases of 30 to 50 per cent for many single family homes, says B.C. Assessment.
The valuations, which are used to determine 2017 property taxes, were taken July 1 — before the province announced its foreign buyers tax and sales began to slow. In a preview of 2017 property assessments, BC Assessment said the 30 to 50 per cent increase over the previous July 1 will be typical for single-family homes in Vancouver, the North Shore, Squamish, Burnaby, the Tri-Cities, Richmond, and Surrey. Increases on residential strata properties, such as condominiums, will be in the 15 to 30 per cent range, according to B.C. Assessment. "That is the market value of those homes as of July 1 of 2016," said Jason Grant, assessor for the Greater Vancouver region.
In Greater Victoria, homeowners are also being told to expect significant increases with single-family homes in Victoria, Saanich, Sidney and Oak Bay rising 10 to 40 per cent and strata residential increases of five to 25 per cent. In the Central Okanagan, increases of five to 20 per cent will be typical for single-family homes in Kelowna, West Kelowa, Westbank and Lake Country, with strata residential increases of five to 30 per cent. Assessments will be available on the B.C. Assessment website for all properties on Jan. 3, 2017. Homeowners will be wondering what such sharp increases, for the second year in a row, will do to their property taxes — but Grant notes what matters is how your property fares relative to others in your property class and local taxing jurisdiction. So, a house in Vancouver would be compared to other residential-class properties, including condos, in the city, said Grant. "Large increases in property assessment do not automatically translate into a corresponding increase in property taxes," he said. "If your property went up less than the average, your taxes could actually go down." Homeowners whose assessments have risen much more sharply than others in their area will receive early notification letters from B.C. Assessment, which are being mailed out this week. About 90,000 such letters are going out around the province this week — representing about four and a half per cent of the two million properties in the province, said Grant. Last year, about 37,000 such letters were sent. The letters ensure property owners are made aware of the significant increases that may impact their property taxes, the assessment website notes. Appealing assessments? UBC Professor Tom Davidoff predicts many homeowners will challenge the valuation. "If you think it was incorrect as of July, you might have an opportunity to challenge. If you think it was grotesquely off and your home was never worth what BC Assessment claims, there is an appeals process," he said. But Davidoff calls the process expensive and time-consuming, and says a property value decreasing since July 1 isn't enough grounds to appeal the valuation. Vancouver-based property tax agent Paul Sullivan recommends people do their homework before they invest in the appeal process. "[A] very small percentage of properties are appealed and a small percentage of those properties are successfully appealed," he warns. |
|
|
|
|
|